The Miranda decision was compiled from four similar cases with the same constitutional issue. In the main case, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona on charges of kidnapping and rape. After a long interrogation, he finally signed a written confession and was later found guilty. Miranda appealed to the United States Supreme Court, stating his fifth amendment right was violated: he should not be compelled to be a witness against himself. In a 5 to 4 split vote, the Supreme Court decided to overturn Miranda's conviction, claiming there must be procedural safeguards in order to protect the accused. I believe the court made the right decision on this case. Everyone accused of a crime must be read and aware their rights, and have an opportunity to be rightfully protected in an interrogation.
Read more on the case
No comments:
Post a Comment